These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pediatric laparoscopic splenectomy: are there real advantages in comparison with the traditional open approach?
    Author: Esposito C, Corcione F, Garipoli V, Ascione G.
    Journal: Pediatr Surg Int; 1997 Sep; 12(7):509-10. PubMed ID: 9238118.
    Abstract:
    The hospital records of patients who underwent splenectomy during the last 2 years were reviewed to compare the advantages of the laparoscopic approach with traditional open splenectomy (OS). Between March 1994 and March 1996, 16 children underwent splenectomy, in 8 using an open approach and 8 by a laparoscopic procedure. Of the patients who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy (LS), 2 had a concomitant cholecystectomy. Ages ranged between 4 and 11 years (mean 6.4 years); there were 9 girls and 7 boys. The indications for splenectomy were: hereditary spherocytosis (7 cases); idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (4); sickle-cell disease (3); and beta-thalassemia (2). The average operating time for OS was 100 min (range, 50-155), for LS 170 min (range 125-240). The hospital stay for patients who had OS ranged from 3 to 9 days (mean 4.7), for those who had LS from 2 to 5 days (mean 3). One OS patient developed a wound infection. In 3 of the LS patients, the spleen was removed via a 7-cm Pfannenstiel minilaparotomy in the suprapubic region; in 5 cases the spleen was captured into an extraction bag, crushed, and removed through the umbilical orifice. The authors believe that LS must be performed only when it is possible to use the extraction bag to remove the spleen from the umbilical orifice (spleens weighing less than 700 g) and when a concomitant procedure such as cholecystectomy is indicated; in other cases OS is preferable.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]