These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Genomes of two water frog species resist germ line exclusion in interspecies hybrids.
    Author: Guerrini F, Bucci S, Ragghianti M, Mancino G, Hotz H, Uzzell T, Berger L.
    Journal: J Exp Zool; 1997 Oct 01; 279(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 9293641.
    Abstract:
    Abundant natural interspecies hybrids between the European water frog Rana ridibunda and at least three other taxa reproduce hemiclonally, by hybridogenesis: the non-ridibunda genome is excluded in the germ line before meiosis, and the unrecombined ridibunda genome is transmitted to haploid gametes. In contrast, natural hybrids between Rana ridibunda and either of two Balkan species (Rana shqiperica and Rana epeirotica) do not show such genome exclusion. This plausibly results from failure of Balkan Rana ridibunda genomes to "induce" such exclusion in the germ line of hybrids, from "resistance" of Rana shqiperica and Rana epeirotica genomes to such exclusion in hybrids with an "inducing" Rana ridibunda genome, or both. We tested the second hypothesis by examining lampbrush chromosome patterns in oocytes of hybrids that in the soma contain one "inducing" ridibunda genome and one genome of either of the two Balkan species. Several lampbrush chromosome markers (e.g., presence and location of certain giant loops and conspicuousness and width of centromeres) discriminate sets of Rana ridibunda chromosomes from those of Rana shqiperica and Rana epeirotica. Based on such markers, nine diploid female hybrids between Rana ridibunda or Rana esculenta from natural hybridogenetic lineages (Rana ridibunda x Rana lessonae, making ridibunda gametes) from central Poland and either Rana shqiperica or Rana epeirotica each contained both parental genomes in primary oocytes; the bivalents showed reduced numbers of chiasmata compared with parental species. It follows that none of these hybrids was hybridogenetic. This conclusion is confirmed, for two hybrids between Rana epeirotica and either Rana ridibunda or Rana esculenta, by protein electrophoretic comparison of somatic tissues with primary oocytes, all of which evidenced allelic markers of both parental species. Because Rana ridibunda genomes that are known to induce germ line genome exclusion when combined in hybrids with Rana lessonae genomes were used, these data provide the first compelling evidence for resistance of Rana shqiperica as well as Rana epeirotica genomes to such exclusion.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]