These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Heterogeneity of DMIPP uptake and its relationship with heterogeneous myocardial blood flow.
    Author: Sloof GW, Visser FC, Comans EF, Groeneveld AB, Bax JJ, van Eenige MJ, van der Vusse GJ, Knapp FF.
    Journal: J Nucl Med; 1997 Sep; 38(9):1424-30. PubMed ID: 9293802.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: To assess its potential role as a new metabolic probe, the relationship between regional uptake of the 15-(p-[125I]-iodophenyl)-3,3-dimethylpentadecanoic acid (DMIPP) fatty acid analog and myocardial blood flow was studied. METHODS: In 14 open-chest dogs, the left anterior descending coronary artery was cannulated and extracorporal bypass-perfused at normal (control group; n = 4) and reduced flow (intervention group; n = 10). Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was assessed with 46Sc-labeled microspheres. Forty minutes after intravenous injection of DMIPP, the heart was excised and cut into 120 samples. In each sample, MBF ml x g(-1) x min(-1) and DMIPP uptake (percentage of the injected dose per gram, %ID/g) were assessed. RESULTS: In normal myocardium, MBF and DMIPP uptake were 1.10 +/- 0.18 ml x g(-1) x min(-1) and 1.18 +/- 0.42 x 10(-2) %ID/g, respectively. In the extracorporal bypass area, flow was reduced to 0.49 +/- 0.20 ml x g(-1) x min(-1) (p < 0.0001 compared to normal), and DMIPP uptake was decreased to 0.75 +/- 0.26 x 10(-2) %ID/g (p < 0.0001 compared to normal). DMIPP uptake and MBF positively correlated in normal (DMIPP uptake = 0.77 +/- 0.23 x MBF; r = 0.41; p < 0.0001) and hypoperfused (DMIPP uptake = 0.35 +/- 0.70 x MBF; r = 0.63; p < 0.0001) myocardium. The heterogeneity, indicated by the coefficient of variation, in normal myocardium was 0.23 +/- 0.05 for MBF and was lower (p < 0.0001) for DMIPP uptake: 0.13 +/- 0.05. During flow reduction, heterogeneity increased significantly (p < 0.0001) for both MBF (0.59 +/- 0.22) and DMIPP uptake (0.37 +/- 0.23). Also heterogeneity of the DMIPP uptake to MBF ratio, as an indicator of agreement, increased from 0.23 +/- 0.07 in normal to 0.46 +/- 0.19 in hypoperfused myocardium (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: DMIPP detects regionally hypoperfused myocardium, in which agreement between MBF and fatty acid uptake deteriorates. DMIPP uptake shows a different relationship with MBF in hypoperfused compared to normal myocardium. These observations suggest that DMIPP uptake may provide additional, unique information on regional myocardial ischemia.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]