These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Analysis of tumor thiol concentrations: comparison of flow cytometric with chemical and biochemical techniques.
    Author: Horan AD, Chan CY, Pletcher CH, Menon C, Evans SM, Moore JS, Koch CJ.
    Journal: Cytometry; 1997 Sep 01; 29(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 9298814.
    Abstract:
    The importance of glutathione (GSH) in contributing to cancer therapy resistance is well established. Various advantages may accrue from the ability to determine the distribution of GSH content in individual tumor cells disaggregated from solid tumors using flow cytometric techniques compared with biochemical or chemical measurements of the average GSH level in bulk tissue samples. The flow cytometric technique requires a thiol-reactive fluorescent adduct which is stable and which can differentiate cellular GSH from protein thiols. Thiol-reactive compounds specific for GSH require facilitated conjugation by endogenous cellular enzymes, but such compounds have not been found to accurately monitor GSH in human cells. Compounds which react generally with all thiols require a GSH-depleted calibration control to assess GSH vs. non-GSH components of fluorescent-adduct formation. Our report addresses this question, and compares three different thiol assays in several cell lines. We have found a simple way to control for non-GSH adduct formation. This involves a selective permeabilization process to release low molecular weight adducts (dominated by GSH and cysteine). In application to the desired goal of assessing the distribution of GSH in cells disaggregated from tumors, we have identified a problem with cell-line-specific thiol loss during the tumor cell disaggregation process.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]