These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Biomechanical evaluation of posterior cervical stabilization after a wide laminectomy.
    Author: Grubb MR, Currier BL, Stone J, Warden KE, An KN.
    Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Sep 01; 22(17):1948-54. PubMed ID: 9306522.
    Abstract:
    STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical investigation with nondestructive and destructive testing in a human cadaveric model simulating a wide postlaminectomy condition. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative stability conferred by a posterior cervical spinal rod system and posterior cervical plating. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior cervical plate fixation has been shown to be biomechanically superior to wiring techniques, but lateral mass screws may injure neurovascular structures or facet joints if they are inserted improperly. A cervical rod system has been developed to enhance the safety of lateral mass instrumentation. METHODS: The cervical spines of 12 cadavers underwent biomechanical testing. After completion of the nondestructive intact testing, a wide laminectomy with subtotal facetectomies from C4 to C6 was performed. The specimens in two subgroups (group A, cervical spine rods with unicortical fixation, and group B, reconstruction plates with bicortical fixation) were tested in flexion, lateral bending, and torsion. Finally, destructive testing in flexion was performed. Stiffness, neutral zone, failure moment, energy to failure, and mechanism of failure were determined for each specimen. The data were analyzed using paired t tests and ANOVA. RESULTS: Group B had a greater mean screw torque value. The instrumented constructs had a greater stiffness ratio (instrumented/intact) than the intact specimens in flexion, lateral bending, and torsional testing. Group A had a significantly greater flexural stiffness than Group B. Neutral zone ratio values were significantly lower during flexural testing for the cervical rod construct. Destructive testing resulted in significantly greater failure moment and energy-to-failure values for group A. In the cervical rod construct, failure occurred primarily by superior screw loosening with pull-out from the lateral mass. Reconstruction plates consistently failed with fracture of the lateral mass and superior screw loosening. CONCLUSION: Significantly greater stability was noted in the cervical rod construct during nondestructive and destructive flexural testing.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]