These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The optimum bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy.
    Author: Drew PJ, Hughes M, Hodson R, Farouk R, Lee PW, Wedgwood KR, Monson JR, Duthie GS.
    Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol; 1997 Aug; 23(4):315-6. PubMed ID: 9315059.
    Abstract:
    With the proposed introduction of a flexible sigmoidoscopic screening programme for colorectal cancer, patient compliance is of paramount importance. Therefore, the bowel preparation providing optimum cleansing of the bowel with the least associated discomfort and inconvenience for the patient must be found. Patients were randomized to receive either Picolax the evening before the examination or self-administered Fleet enemas prior to the investigation. The endoscopist and nurse practitioner who collected data on a standard questionnaire were blinded to the preparation used. Bowel preparation was graded by the endoscopist as: excellent, good, adequate or poor. One hundred and two consecutive patients were randomized: 56 to the Fleet enema group and 46 to the Picolax group. Self-administered Fleet enemas provided a significantly superior bowel preparation with 52 (93%) being judged adequate or better, as opposed to 34 (74%) in the Picolax group. In addition, Fleet enemas were associated with significantly fewer adverse associated symptoms: 11 (20%) vs 24 (52%). Patients reported to be willing to receive Fleet enemas again in 53 (95%) vs 37 (80%) for the Picolax group. The self-administered Fleet enema is superior to Picolax in terms of bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy and the incidence of associated adverse symptoms.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]