These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prognostic value of specific KRAS mutations in lung adenocarcinomas.
    Author: Siegfried JM, Gillespie AT, Mera R, Casey TJ, Keohavong P, Testa JR, Hunt JD.
    Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1997 Oct; 6(10):841-7. PubMed ID: 9332768.
    Abstract:
    Adenocarcinomas of the lung remain a significant public health problem. Locally defined (stage I) tumors are considered amenable to resection with curative intent. However, only about 45% of these patients survive for 5 years. The median survival for more advanced tumors is drastically lower. Much research has been focused on identifying a valid genetic biomarker of prognosis. Mutations of the proto-oncogene KRAS have been identified by some groups as being a valid prognostic indicator for adenocarcinoma of the lung. To evaluate the effect of KRAS gene mutation on the survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma, 181 archival tumors were examined by PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Mutations in either codon 12 or 13 were found in 31.5% of the samples. The most common mutation was a G-->T transversion in codon 12, representing 66.7% of the mutations. No difference was observed in the survival of patients with a KRAS mutation versus those whose tumors contained wild-type KRAS. This lack of difference was also observed when the analysis was restricted to those with stage I tumors or when patients with stage I or II disease were grouped together. However, certain amino acid substitutions, including cysteine, arginine, and aspartate, indicated a significantly poorer prognosis, whereas hydrophobic amino acid substitutions showed a significantly better prognosis than wild-type (P = 0.04). Sample sizes were small for this analysis due to the number of possible mutations. As expected, the stage of tumor at resection was the most significant predictor of outcome. Based on this study of 181 patients from two major medical centers located in different cities, we conclude that KRAS mutation status is not a satisfactory predictor of prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma, but the substitution of a polar or charged amino acid for the wild-type glycine residue may be a negative prognostic indicator.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]