These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Performance, breast meat yield and abdominal fat deposition of male broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with DL-methionine or DL-methionine hydroxy analogue free acid.
    Author: Esteve-Garcia E, Llauradó LL.
    Journal: Br Poult Sci; 1997 Sep; 38(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 9347149.
    Abstract:
    1. An experiment was conducted to compare the relative bioefficacy of DL-methionine hydroxy analogue free acid (DL-MHA-FA) with DL-methionine in broiler chickens. Responses used for comparison were weight gain and food efficiency between 7 and 35 d of age, and breast meat deposition, food cost per kg of breast meat, and abdominal fat at 41 d of age. 2. A total of 2160 seven-day-old male broiler chicks were used. The feeding programme consisted of a starter diet from 7 to 21 d, and a finisher diet till the end of the experiment. The starter basal diet contained 6.1 g/kg total sulphur-containing amino acids (TSAA), and an estimated metabolisable energy (ME) content of 13.2 MJ/kg. The finisher diet contained 5.8g/kg TSAA and an estimated ME content of 13.6 MJ/kg. Four concentrations of DL-methionine and DL-MHA-FA were added at 0.5 g/kg increments on an equimolar basis. Therefore, there were 9 experimental treatments which were each applied to 6 replicates of 40 chicks. Weight gain and food efficiency were determined at 35 d of age. Breast yield and carcase fat were measured at 41 d. 3. Significant responses to graded amounts of both methionine sources were observed in weight gain, food efficiency, breast meat percentage, and food cost per kg of breast meat. The responses fitted exponential regression curves. Based on the regression coefficients, equimolar bioefficacy of DL-MHA-FA relative to DL-methionine was 80% for daily gain, 83% for food efficiency, 51% for breast meat yield, and 66% for food cost per kg of breast meat. Differences between the 2 sources were significant (P < 0.05) for breast meat yield and food cost per kg of meat and (P < 0.10) for food efficiency.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]