These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Transvenous versus perinervous stimulation of the phrenic nerve to assess the diaphragmatic strength in rabbits.
    Author: Marie JP, Tardif C, Gibon JF, Lerosey Y, Hellot MF, Pasquis P, Dehesdin D.
    Journal: J Neurosci Methods; 1997 Oct 03; 76(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 9350964.
    Abstract:
    Diaphragmatic strength can be measured by transdiaphragmatic pressure during phrenic nerve stimulation. In order to avoid phrenic nerve dissection, a transjugular approach of the phrenic nerve can be performed. The objective of this study was to verify the identity of perinervous and transvenous techniques of phrenic nerve stimulation to assess diaphragmatic force. In intact (n = 9) or right phrenicotomized (n = 12) rabbits, we compared esophageal pressure (Peso) induced by supramaximal perinervous stimulation of the phrenic nerve with that obtained by transvenous stimulation of the phrenic nerve. Electromyography (EMG) of the thoracic muscles was studied in four animals. We found no difference between Peso induced by perinervous (PNS) and transvenous (TVS) unilateral or bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation. During unilateral stimulation, no EMG activity was recorded in the non stimulated diaphragm, or in the middle part of the esophagus, or in ipsi- and contralateral accessory inspiratory muscles. We conclude that in rabbits, unilateral or bilateral TVS of the phrenic nerve is functionally equivalent to PNS, whatever the side of stimulation; Peso is not altered by esophageal contraction in TVS. Transvenous stimulation can replace perinervous stimulation in experimental studies, when cervical access is difficult.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]