These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Improved resolution for PET volume imaging through three-dimensional iterative reconstruction. Author: Liow JS, Strother SC, Rehm K, Rottenberg DA. Journal: J Nucl Med; 1997 Oct; 38(10):1623-31. PubMed ID: 9379203. Abstract: UNLABELLED: It has been demonstrated that in two-dimensional iterative reconstruction, a resolution model can improve image resolution while controlling noise. With the lower noise levels of three-dimensional PET volume imaging, these iterative reconstruction advantages may be extended to three dimensions to further improve the reconstructed image resolution. METHODS: We have implemented three-dimensional versions of iterative filtered backprojection (IFBP) and the maximum likelihood by expectation maximization (ML-EM) reconstruction algorithms and applied them to three-dimensional PET volume datasets. The results were compared to images obtained using the standard three-dimensional reprojection reconstruction (3DRP) algorithm. RESULTS: For IFBP with 15 iterations and no regularization compared to 3DRP, both using a ramp filter, the transaxial resolution improved 52%, and the axial resolution improved 39%. With a strong regularization, the transaxial and axial resolution improvements were reduced to 6% and 5%, respectively. If a Hanning roll-off is applied to the ramp filter in the transaxial direction, the transaxial resolution for IFBP without regularization improved 35% compared to 3DRP; with regularization the improvement dropped to 19%. The axial resolution for IFBP and 3DRP was unaffected by this transaxial smoothing in the reconstruction filter. With the same Hanning roll-off, the noise for IFBP without regularization increased by a factor of 6 compared to 3DRP; with regularization the noise was increased only by a factor of 3. Compared to IFBP, the three-dimensional ML-EM reconstruction produced similar resolution improvements with a much smaller increase in noise and slower convergence. Resolution improvements from both IFBP and ML-EM reconstructions are visually apparent in three-dimensional FDG brain images and result in increased activation signals in a three-dimensional [15O]water functional activation study. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that resolution improvement is possible for IFBP and ML-EM compared to 3DRP with or without noise increase.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]