These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Establishing and using a local/regional cardiac surgery database.
    Author: Arom KV, Petersen RJ, Orszulak TA, Bolman RM, Wickstrom PH, Joyce LD, Spooner TH, Tell BL, Janey PA.
    Journal: Ann Thorac Surg; 1997 Nov; 64(5):1245-9. PubMed ID: 9386686.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: In 1993, the Minnesota Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Minnesota Cardiac Surgery Database were organized in response to a third-party payer demand for data about practice protocols and patient outcomes. It has matured to an active organization of 46 cardiothoracic surgeons, 14 institutions, and more than 7,000 patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Data are validated for completeness and accuracy through a statewide auditing process. They are coded by hospital, analyzed using the standard Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database format and definitions, and reviewed quarterly in a continuous quality improvement process. RESULTS: Through data review and exchange site visits, variations in practice protocols and outcomes have been identified. For example, our statewide data review and continuous quality improvement process identified prolonged ventilation (more than 24 hours) as one variation. Multidisciplinary teams were defined, and statewide exchange site visits led by cardiovascular surgeons were implemented. An example of the improvement in the accuracy and completeness of the data used to study procedure outcomes is represented by the improved reporting of ejection fraction values that has resulted from this process. CONCLUSIONS: Using the standardized Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database and the Minnesota Society of Thoracic Surgeons organizational structure to establish a high-quality database will allow for statewide peer review, exchange of practice guidelines, and promotion of standardization, which eventually can improve outcomes and reduce costs. This organization or model can be replicated at any local, state, or regional level. Thoracic surgeons faced with similar challenges for public disclosure of surgical results can learn much from the successful development of the Minnesota Cardiac Surgery Database.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]