These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Coupled vs. uncoupled pericardial constraint: effects on cardiac chamber interactions.
    Author: Takata M, Harasawa Y, Beloucif S, Robotham JL.
    Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985); 1997 Dec; 83(6):1799-813. PubMed ID: 9390949.
    Abstract:
    The effects of pericardial constraint on cardiac chamber interactions were evaluated by mathematical model analyses based on a novel concept of coupled vs. uncoupled pericardial constraint. We hypothesized that the nature of pericardial constraint can be classified as a "coupled" constraint exerted by uniform liquid pressure or an "uncoupled" constraint exerted by regional surface pressure. The numerical solution of the model of atrioventricular interaction produced the characteristic waveforms in venous flows and right atrial/ventricular pressures in classical pericardial diseases. Coupled constraint accounted for the patterns in cardiac tamponade; uncoupled constraint accounted for those in constrictive pericarditis. Analytic solution of the model of ventricular interdependence demonstrated that coupled constraint (tamponade) produced greater gains in ventricular interdependence, increasing the occurrence of pulsus paradoxus, whereas uncoupled constraint (constriction) produced a greater effective right ventricular elastance, increasing the likelihood of Kussmaul's sign. Thus the concept of coupled vs. uncoupled constraint may offer a coherent framework to understand the characteristic steady-state and respiratory-induced hemodynamic events in multiple forms of pericardial diseases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]