These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Errors of computer electrocardiography.
    Author: RuDusky BM.
    Journal: Angiology; 1997 Dec; 48(12):1045-50. PubMed ID: 9404830.
    Abstract:
    A review of 6938 computer-generated electrocardiogram interpretations was undertaken by a single cardiologist. The computer-assisted program correctly interpreted 51.6% of the tracings. One or more corrections were necessary in 48.4%. The greatest number of incorrect interpretations involved repolarization (T wave) abnormalities, followed by ST segment changes. It is mandatory that computer-generated ECG interpretations be reviewed by an experienced electrocardiographer. Reliance on nonreviewed ECG interpretations may result in incorrect diagnoses that could lead to inappropriate management decisions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]