These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The success of locoregional, low-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy in tumor-bearing mice is dependent on the time of rIL-2 administration.
    Author: Everse LA, Bernsen MR, Dullens HF, Den Otter W.
    Journal: J Exp Ther Oncol; 1996 Jul; 1(4):231-6. PubMed ID: 9414409.
    Abstract:
    The extremely different administration schedules that are used in testing recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) therapies for cancer may account for the extreme variation in efficacy reported in various studies in animal models. A major point may be the variation of the time interval between tumor transplantation and rIL-2 therapy. We hypothesized that administration of rIL-2 before the immune system has mounted a specific cellular reaction against the tumor (associated antigens) might result in lesser efficacies than later rIL-2 administration. This hypothesis was tested in DBA/2 mice bearing a syngeneic SL2 lymphoma. When 7000 IV/day rIL-2 was administered to tumor-bearing mice for 5 consecutive days starting on day 1, 3, 4, 5, or 6 after tumor inoculation, the survival curve of the mice did not significantly differ from that of diluent-treated mice. In contrast, a significant difference was observed when treatment was begun on day 7, 8, 9, 10, or 12 (p < or = 0.004). rIL-2 therapies begun on day 9 or 10 were most effective, curing up to 80% of mice treated, despite there being an enormous burden of disseminated tumor present at that time (1-4% of the total body weight). When rIL-2 was administered for fewer than 5 consecutive days, beginning on day 10, the efficacy of the therapy dropped radically (p < or = 0.055). Involvement of a specific anti-tumor reaction was also tested. All mice that were cured of the tumor as a result of rIL-2 therapy proved to be specifically immune to the SL2 tumor. Furthermore, day 10-14 administration of rIL-2 was completely ineffective in CD4(+)-cell depleted mice (p = 0.0116 vs. rIL-2 therapy in non-depleted mice). Together, this implies that this form of rIL-2 therapy is mediated by tumor-specific T-cells. As a whole, these results indicate that T-cell mediated rIL-2 therapy of cancer in animal models is sensitive to the time when the rIL-2 is administered and to the length of time for which the rIL-2 is given. This should be taken into account when planning new therapy protocols and when analyzing published data.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]