These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [CT angiography in arterial occlusive disease: comparison of 3 rendering techniques].
    Author: Rieker O, Mildenberger P, Neufang A, von Zitzewitz H, Schweden F, Thelen M.
    Journal: Rofo; 1997 Oct; 167(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 9417264.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To evaluate different rendering techniques of CT data for the assessment of long vessel segments in peripheral vascular occlusive disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 40 CT angiograms (aortoiliac: n = 20, leg arteries: n = 20) were viewed using three different rendering techniques: 1, maximum intensity projection (MIP); 2, volume rendering (VR); 3, shaded surface display (SSD). CT angiograms were obtained in 6 or 8 projections. Axial cross-section images were analysed using an interactive cine mode. Intraarterial DSA was the standard in all cases. RESULTS: The sensitivities for the diagnosis of occlusive disease were 100% (cross-section images), 94% (MIP), 91% (VR) and 93% (SSD). The specificities were 100%, 99%, 99% and 99%, respectively. For the accurate grading of high-grade (> 75%) stenoses, the sensitivities were 85% (cross-section images), 62% (MIP), 44% (VR) and 35% (SSD). Specificity was 99% for all techniques. CONCLUSIONS: CTA is accurate in occlusive disease. Interactive viewing of cross-section images is the most accurate technique. MIP is superior to VR in the imaging of high-grade stenoses because contrast-to-noise ratio is high and thresholding is not necessary.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]