These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Variable effects of cardiomyoplasty on left ventricular function.
    Author: Chiang BB, Ali AT, Storey J, Riordan C, Ballen J, Montgomery W, Slater AD, Santamore WP.
    Journal: Artif Organs; 1997 Dec; 21(12):1277-83. PubMed ID: 9423979.
    Abstract:
    Cardiomyoplasty (CMP) has been considered as a possible treatment for patients with heart failure. Symptomatic improvements occur almost uniformly among survivors with CMP, but changes in left peak ventricular systolic pressure (PVSP) and stroke volume vary in patients. This study examined whether there is variability present shortly after cardiomyoplasty surgery. Cardiomyoplasty was performed in 11 mongrel dogs with normal ventricular function. Nine to twelve days after CMP, left ventricular (LV) function was evaluated by simultaneously measuring LV volume (conductance catheter) and pressure (Millar catheter). The latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) was stimulated synchronously with ventricular systole in a ratio of 1:4 to 1:7 to avoid muscle fatigue. Data were analyzed on a beat by beat basis. The PVSP, and maximum dP/dt (+dP/dt) increased, but the absolute value of minimum dP/dt (-dP/dt) decreased in stimulated beats in 7 dogs while 4 dogs did not respond. The net changes in stimulated beats versus nonstimulated beats of PVSP were 6.1 +/- 1.8 mm Hg (4.3%), of stroke work was 4.5 +/- 1.9 gm x m (29.5%), of +dP/dt was 185 +/- 47 mm Hg/s (8%), and of -dP/dt was 168 +/- 43 mm Hg/s (7.8%) (p < 0.05) for all these net changes in the responding group while these variations were not significant in the nonresponding group. From the results of our study, active LDM assist improves left ventricular systolic function, occurring in only 7 of 11 experiments. This improvement is inconsistent and varied individually. The integrity of the LDM, tightness of wrapping, and adhesions might contribute to the variability which is present early after surgery and before the LDM is converted into a fatigue resistance muscle.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]