These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [The effect of needle type and immobilization on postspinal headache].
    Author: Hafer J, Rupp D, Wollbrück M, Engel J, Hempelmann G.
    Journal: Anaesthesist; 1997 Oct; 46(10):860-6. PubMed ID: 9424969.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a significant complication of spinal anaesthesia. Diameter and tip of the needle as well as the patient's age have been proven to be important determinants. The question of whether post-operative recumbency can reduce the risk of PDPH has not been answered uniformly. And besides, some studies referring to this subject reveal methodical failures, for example, as to clear definition and exact documentation of post-operative immobilization. Furthermore, fine-gauge needles (26G or more) have not been investigated yet. The first aim of our study was therefore to examine the role of recumbency in the prevention of PDPH under controlled conditions using thin needles. Secondly, we wanted to confirm the reported prophylactic effect of needles with a modified, atraumatic tip (Whitacre and Atraucan) by comparing them to Quincke needles of identical diameter. Most of the former investigators compared Quincke with atraumatic needles of different size regardless of the known influence of the diameter on PDPH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study we included 481 consecutive patients undergoing a total of 500 orthopaedic operations under spinal anaesthesia. The latter was performed in a standardized manner (patient sitting, midline approach, needle with parallel bevel direction), using four different needles allocated randomly (26-gauge and 27-gauge needles with Quincke tip, 26-gauge Atraucan and 27-gauge Whitacre cannula). Half of the patients were instructed to stay in bed for 24 h (horizontal position without raising head), the others to get up as early as possible. An anaesthesiologist visited the patients on the fourth postoperative day or later and questioned them about headache and duration of recumbency. Additionally, the patients had to fill out a questionnaire 1 week after surgery. Any postural headache was considered as PDPH. RESULTS: The four groups of different needles had homogeneous demographic characteristics (see Table 1). A total of 47 patients (9.4%) developed PDPH. The incidence was highest after puncture with a 26-gauge Quincke cannula (17.6%) with a significant difference compared to the other needles (see Table 2). PDPH incidence correlated well with increasing age and number of dural punctures, but showed no relation to sex, patient's history of headache or experience of the anaesthesiologist. Only about half of the patients (60.5%) followed the instructions regarding mobilization or recumbency. The duration of strict bed rest did not influence the development of PDPH: The overall incidence was 9.4% in the recumbency group and 8.8% in the group of early ambulation. In all, 45 patients suffered from ordinary not posture-related headache. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly higher incidence of PDPH after spinal anaesthesia with 26-gauge Quincke needles compared to the 27-gauge Quincke and the 26-gauge Atraucan group confirmed the importance of both needle diameter and design of its tip. The Atraucan cannula has not been examined in a controlled study (in comparison with Quincke needle of the same diameter) before. In accordance with other investigators we found patient's age and number of puncture attempts as additional predictors of PDPH. Consequent bed rest, however, was not able to reduce its incidence. Our studies reveal the poor compliance of patients with regard to mobilization/immobilization, a problem which possibly has not been considered enough in former studies examining the influence of bed rest on PDPH. Based on the literature and the present findings, we recommend using thin needles with atraumatic tips for spinal anaesthesia if possible. Recumbency presents an avoidable stress for patients as well as medical staff and should no longer be ordered.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]