These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Relevance of arteriovenous concentration differences in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of midazolam.
    Author: Tuk B, Herben VM, Mandema JW, Danhof M.
    Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1998 Jan; 284(1):202-7. PubMed ID: 9435179.
    Abstract:
    In the present investigation, the extent of arteriovenous concentration differences of midazolam in rats was quantified, and the consequences of these differences on the pharmacodynamic estimates were determined. The arterial concentration-effect relationships where analyzed by a traditional-effect compartment model that characterizes the delay between blood and the effect site with the rate constant k(eo). Venous concentration-effect relationships where analyzed according to the traditional model and an extended-effect compartment model that, by incorporating an additional rate constant k(vo), can characterize the delay between the arterial and venous sampling site. Significant hysteresis was observed in the arterial but not the venous concentration-effect relationships. Rate constants for k(eo), k(vo) and terminal half-life were (mean +/- S.E.M.) 0.32 +/- 0.062, 0.093 +/- 0.013 and 0.0217 +/- 0.0008 min-1, respectively, indicating the existence of significant arteriovenous concentration differences. Pharmacodynamic estimates as determined on basis of the arterial concentrations and the traditional-effect compartment model were EC50 = 104 +/- 1 ng/ml, Emax = 151 +/- 4 microV/sec and gamma = 0.83 +/- 0.06. Analysis of the venous concentration-effect relationships on basis of the traditional- or extended-effect compartment model led to similar pharmacodynamic estimates, indicating that the observed arteriovenous concentration differences did not result in biased pharmacodynamic estimates. This is due to the fact that the effect relevant elimination rate constant of midazolam is relatively small compared with its k(eo). The observed results are consistent with earlier reports based on computer simulations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]