These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study.
    Author: Yerdel MA, Koksoy C, Aras N, Orita K.
    Journal: Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1997 Dec; 7(6):483-6. PubMed ID: 9438632.
    Abstract:
    The results of open cholecystectomy ([OC] n = 7) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy ([LC] n = 7) in cirrhotic patients were analyzed prospectively. Groups were well matched for surgical indication, presence of ascites/bleeding tendency, and Child's grade. There was no mortality. Mean operating time was significantly longer in the LC group (155 +/- 47 vs. 103 +/- 25 min, p < 0.05). Operative blood loss was significantly greater in the OC group (128 +/- 125 vs. 642 +/- 467 ml, p < 0.05). No patient in LC group required blood transfusion in contrast to three patients in OC group. Compared with 0% postoperative complications in LC group, wound infections developed in 43% of the patients in OC group (p < 0.05). Mean hospital stay in LC group was significantly less (6.7 +/- 4 vs. 17.4 +/- 7.3 days, p < 0.01). Thus, contrary to previous belief, cirrhosis per se is not a contraindication to LC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be the procedure of choice whenever cholecystectomy is indicated in a cirrhotic patient because it may be associated with less bleeding and fewer incision-related complications.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]