These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: p53 protein accumulation predicts poor response to tamoxifen therapy of patients with recurrent breast cancer. Author: Berns EM, Klijn JG, van Putten WL, de Witte HH, Look MP, Meijer-van Gelder ME, Willman K, Portengen H, Benraad TJ, Foekens JA. Journal: J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jan; 16(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 9440732. Abstract: PURPOSE: Mutations of the p53 gene are frequently observed in primary breast cancer and accumulation of p53 protein has been used as a surrogate marker of p53 inactivation. Previous studies have shown that p53 accumulation is related to poor prognosis in primary breast cancer. We studied whether p53 protein accumulation is a predictive factor for response to tamoxifen treatment in patients with recurrent breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Levels of p53, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) were assayed in cytosolic extracts derived from primary tumors of 401 tamoxifen-naive patients who developed recurrent disease. All patients in the study received tamoxifen therapy upon relapse (median follow-up, 69 months). Association of tested factors with response to tamoxifen treatment was studied by logistic regression analysis, and with survival after the start of treatment by Cox univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: p53 levels (median, 0.23 ng/mg protein) were not related to ER or PgR levels, but positively correlated with uPA (P < .0001). In a test for trend, we observed an association of p53 protein levels with response to tamoxifen therapy. When dichotomized (at the median value), 42% in the p53-high versus 56% in the p53-low group showed a response. In multivariate analysis, including patient and tumor characteristics, p53 accumulation retained significance with the rate of response (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.74; P < .001). Also in multivariate analysis, reduced survival after the start of tamoxifen therapy was observed in the p53-high group (relative hazards rate [RHR], 1.56, 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.10; P = .002). A statistically significant association between p53 levels and decreased tamoxifen response was seen only in the subset of patients whose tumors expressed low levels of ER or PgR (<75 fmol/mg protein). CONCLUSION: Measurement of primary tumor p53 levels may be effective in predicting response to tamoxifen therapy in recurrent breast disease. However, more confirming studies on the association between p53 protein accumulation and response to antiestrogen therapy are needed before tumor p53 levels can be used in routine clinical practice.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]