These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Infrared tympanic thermometry. Experience and training does not improve the quality of measurement results].
    Author: Petersen MH, Hauge HN.
    Journal: Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Nov 20; 117(28):4083-6. PubMed ID: 9441442.
    Abstract:
    Nurses, with and without training in the use of infrared tympanic thermometry, performed measurement sequences on patients. One rectal and two repeated measurements with each of two types of equipment for infrared tympanic thermometry (Genius, Core Check) were used in each sequence. Rectal measurements showed temperatures significantly higher than infrared tympanic thermometry, but there were variations (Genius 0.3 +/- 0.58 (SD) degree C, Core Check 0.5 +/- 0.42 (SD) degree C). The sensitivity of infrared tympanic thermometry for fever, as defined by rectal measurements, was 36% for Genius and 21% for Core Check. The quality of the measurements was not improved by training. Our results indicate that infrared tympanic thermometry should be used with caution when screening for fever in hospitals.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]