These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Combination of systemic acetazolamide and topical dorzolamide in reducing intraocular pressure and aqueous humor formation.
    Author: Rosenberg LF, Krupin T, Tang LQ, Hong PH, Ruderman JM.
    Journal: Ophthalmology; 1998 Jan; 105(1):88-92; discussion 92-3. PubMed ID: 9442783.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine whether topical dorzolamide and systemic acetazolamide have an additive effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) and aqueous humor formation (AHF). DESIGN: This was a prospective, open-label, two-protocol clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen patients with ocular hypertension or with primary open-angle glaucoma were studied. INTERVENTION: Baseline AHF was measured by computerized fluorophotometry and IOP by pneumatonometry without antiglaucoma therapy. In the first protocol, dorzolamide was randomized to one eye (N = 10) and IOP and AHF measurements were repeated. One week later, having used dorzolamide in one eye three times daily, patients had measurements performed before and after the single administration of oral acetazolamide 250 mg. In the second protocol, having used acetazolamide 250 mg four times daily for 4 to 7 days (N = 6), patients had measurements performed before and after a single drop of dorzolamide was instilled randomly into one eye. The patient continued acetazolamide and unilateral dorzolamide for 4 to 7 more days and returned for IOP and AHF measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure and AHF were measured in treated and contralateral control eyes. RESULTS: In the first protocol, IOP (mmHg +/- standard deviation) was significantly (P = 0.02) lower in the dorzolamide (16.3 +/- 2.6) than in the contralateral control (19.9 +/- 2.9) eyes. Aqueous humor formation (microliter/minute +/- standard deviation) also was lower (P = 0.02) in dorzolamide eyes (1.79 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.33 +/- 0.5). After oral acetazolamide 250 mg, IOP was unchanged in dorzolamide eyes (17.6 +/- 2.0 preacetazolamide vs. 17.9 +/- 2.0 postacetazolamide), whereas it was reduced (P = 0.003) in control eyes (20.5 +/- 2.2 preacetazolamide vs. 16.9 +/- 2.3 postacetazolamide). Aqueous humor formation was reduced in control eyes (2.31 +/- 0.8 preacetazolamide vs. 1.73 +/- 0.6 postacetazolamide; P = 0.005) but not in dorzolamide-treated eyes (1.56 +/- 0.45 preacetazolamide vs. 1.77 +/- 0.39 postacetazolamide). In the second protocol, acetazolamide 250 mg four times daily symmetrically reduced IOP and AHF in both eyes. After single-drop dorzolamide in one eye, IOP and AHF did not change significantly. After 4 to 7 days of acetazolamide and unilateral dorzolamide, IOP and AHF remained reduced to a similar level in dorzolamide and control eyes not receiving topical therapy. CONCLUSION: Topical dorzolamide and oral acetazolamide, in the concentrations and doses used in this study, are not additive. Either drug alone results in maximum reduction in IOP and AHF. Concomitant glaucoma therapy of a topical and systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitor is not warranted.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]