These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Feeding response to mercaptoacetate in Osborne-Mendel and S5B/PL rats.
    Author: Singer LK, York DA, Bray GA.
    Journal: Obes Res; 1997 Nov; 5(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 9449144.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this experiment was to determine if Osborne-Mendel (OM) rats, which are susceptible to dietary-induced obesity, and S5B/PL (S5B) rats, which are resistant to dietary-induced obesity, differ in their feeding responses to mercaptoacetate (MA), which blocks fatty acid oxidation, or 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG), which blocks glucose utilization. 2DG (100 mg/kg or 200 mg/kg) increased food intake in both strains of rats on a high-fat diet (56% energy from fat). Mercaptoacetate (600 mumol/kg) increased food intake in OM but not S5B rats on a high-fat diet. When maintained on a low-fat diet (10% energy from fat), MA (400 mumol/kg or 600 mumol/kg) stimulated food intake in OM rats, whereas S5B rats increased food intake only after the highest dose of MA (600 mumol/kg). MA stimulated carbohydrate and protein intake in OM rats maintained on a macronutrient selection diet, whereas S5B rats maintained on this diet did not significantly increase intake of any macronutrient after MA. These results demonstrate that OM and S5B rats have a similar food intake response to 2DG but a dissimilar response to MA. The variable response to MA in these strains may be due to a difference in peripheral or central signaling systems related to fatty acid oxidation or a difference in metabolic environments between the strains, which in turn affects the feeding response to MA. These studies suggest that a difference in control of fatty acid oxidation may account for the difference in susceptibility to obesity when eating a high-fat diet.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]