These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Randomized, prospective comparison of increased preload versus inotropes in the resuscitation of trauma patients: effects on cardiopulmonary function and visceral perfusion.
    Author: Miller PR, Meredith JW, Chang MC.
    Journal: J Trauma; 1998 Jan; 44(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 9464757.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of maintaining increased levels of preload on cardiopulmonary function and visceral perfusion during resuscitation. METHODS: Randomized, prospective study of 39 consecutive trauma patients with a low right ventricular ejection fraction (<40%) admitted to a university Level I trauma center during a 10-month period. Patients were randomized to one of two groups: increased preload (PL), or normal preload with inotropes (INO). The PL group received fluid administration to maintain a target right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) > or = 120 mL/m2 during resuscitation. The INO group had inotropes added according to a prospectively determined protocol and was maintained at a RVEDVI of 90 to 100 mL/m2. Systemic perfusion was assessed using oxygen transport and acid-base parameters, and pulmonary function was evaluated with PaO2/FiO2 ratio, dynamic compliance, ventilator days, and incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome. Gut perfusion was assessed by measuring gastric intramucosal pH (pHi). Data are expressed as means +/- SD. RESULTS: The mean RVEDVI was significantly higher in the PL group (n = 19) than in the INO group (n = 20) during resuscitation (119+/-18 vs. 103+/-22 mL/m2, p = 0.01). There was no difference in oxygen delivery, mixed venous oxygen saturation, lactate, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, dynamic compliance, or ventilator days between the groups. The incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome was not significantly different (PL 31% vs. INO 50%, p > 0.1). In the patients who had pHi measured sequentially during resuscitation (PL = 13, INO = 17), the final pHi was significantly higher in the PL group (7.31+/-0.1 vs. 7.16+/-0.2, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients resuscitated at higher levels of preload have significantly better visceral perfusion than those resuscitated at normal preload with addition of inotropes. This higher preload does not adversely affect pulmonary function.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]