These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: A placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of the long-term effects of albuterol administration in patients with cystic fibrosis.
    Author: König P, Poehler J, Barbero GJ.
    Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol; 1998 Jan; 25(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 9475328.
    Abstract:
    This placebo-controlled study was designed to confirm a previously performed open label study that showed significant improvement in spirometry on maintenance therapy with albuterol for 1 year. In a double-blind, cross-over trial, albuterol (by metered dose inhaler) 180 microg b.i.d. or placebo were given for 6 months each. Spirometry was monitored at the start, and 3 and 6 months following initiation of each arm of the study. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was measured twice daily at home before and after study drug administration. Only patients with clinically detectable lung disease were enrolled. Twenty-one patients finished the study. All spirometric tests showed a significant improvement from start to end of the 6 month treatment with albuterol; there was no significant change on placebo. Forced vital capacity improved by 8.2% and forced expiratory volume in 1 s by 12.1% on albuterol therapy. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference between change on albuterol and change on placebo. Home measurements of PEFR showed a significant improvement of 4.7% on albuterol and a non-significant change of 2.0% on placebo from the first to the last week of treatment. None of the long-term improvements (spirometry or home PEFR) correlated with mean daily bronchodilation. For albuterol, the number of days of hospitalization was less than half that for patients on placebo (1.0/patient on albuterol versus 2.6 on placebo), but this did not reach statistical significance. These results suggest a beneficial effect from maintenance therapy with albuterol. Bronchodilation alone probably cannot explain the long-term benefits of albuterol, and other mechanisms may play a role. The lack of significant difference between change on albuterol and change on placebo is probably due to too small a number of patients in this study and lack of statistical power.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]