These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Independent pathways of p53 induction by cisplatin and X-rays in a cisplatin-resistant ovarian tumor cell line.
    Author: Siddik ZH, Mims B, Lozano G, Thai G.
    Journal: Cancer Res; 1998 Feb 15; 58(4):698-703. PubMed ID: 9485023.
    Abstract:
    The p53 tumor suppressor gene is critical in regulating cell proliferation following DNA damage, and disruption of p53 protein function by mutation has been implicated as a factor responsible for resistance of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic agents. Our studies were initiated by asking whether the translational product of the p53 gene is associated with cisplatin resistance in the 2780CP human ovarian tumor model. We have demonstrated by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and sequencing that p53 in parental cisplatin-sensitive A2780 cells was wild type. In 2780CP cells, however, a mutation was found in exon 5 at codon 172 (Val to Phe). Interestingly, exposure to X-rays resulted in p53 induction in both A2780 and 2780CP tumor models. The p53 increases by the ionizing radiation were accompanied by concomitant increases in levels of the p53-regulated p21Waf1/Cip1 protein and led to arrest of cells in G1 phase of the cell cycle. A yeast functional assay confirmed that p53 in A2780 was wild type, but, more importantly, it provided evidence that the p53 mutation in 2780CP cells was temperature sensitive and heterozygous. These experiments demonstrate that sensitive and resistant cells have normal p53 functions, despite the presence of p53 mutation in the 2780CP model. In parallel investigations using the Western technique, exposure of A2780 cells to clinically relevant concentrations of cisplatin (1-20 microM) resulted in time- and dose-dependent increases in p53, together with coordinate increases in p21Waf1/Cip1. In contrast, cisplatin did not induce these proteins in 2780CP cells to any significant degree. The results indicate that a defect exists in the signal transduction pathway for p53 induction following cisplatin-induced DNA damage in 2780CP cells, and this may represent a significant mechanism of cisplatin resistance. Furthermore, induction of p53 in 2780CP cells by X-rays, but not cisplatin, strongly suggests that independent pathways are involved in p53 regulation for the two DNA-damaging agents.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]