These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Adhesion formation after intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene mesh. Author: Farmer L, Ayoub M, Warejcka D, Southerland S, Freeman A, Solis M. Journal: Am Surg; 1998 Feb; 64(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 9486886. Abstract: Polypropylene mesh is commonly used in open and laparoscopic hernia repairs. We tested the hypothesis that intra-abdominal adhesion formation secondary to polypropylene mesh is greater when mesh is placed in an intraperitoneal versus an extraperitoneal position. Fifty adult male rats underwent midline laparotomy with or without implantation of a nonabsorbable mesh. There were ten rats in each of the following five groups: EP-M, creation of an extraperitoneal pocket without mesh placement; EP+M, mesh placement in an extraperitoneal pocket; IP+M, intraperitoneal mesh; IT-M, creation of an abdominal wall ischemic defect without mesh placement; IT+M, ischemic defect plus mesh. Adhesion formation was graded on a scale of 0 to 5, 2 weeks after operation. All groups formed adhesions. Tissue injury or the placement of a mesh in an intraperitoneal position resulted in significantly more adhesions. An entirely extraperitoneal approach to mesh placement is needed to minimize adhesions after laparoscopic hernia repair.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]