These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of stimulus intensity on spine recorded somatosensory evoked potential in dogs.
    Author: Cozzi P, Poncelet L, Michaux C, Balligand M.
    Journal: Am J Vet Res; 1998 Feb; 59(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 9492940.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of stimulus intensity on the characteristics of the spine recorded somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) in dogs. ANIMALS: 11 healthy Beagles, 1 to 2 years old. DESIGN AND PROCEDURE: In 10 dogs, square-wave stimuli (0.1-ms duration, 4 Hz) were delivered through needle electrodes inserted close to the right tibial nerve at the tibiotarsal joint. A standard stimulus strength (reference effective stimulus [RS]) was established for each dog by determining the stimulus necessary to induce a maximal M wave (muscle evoked potential) in the plantar interosseus muscles. The polarity of the stimulating electrodes was then reversed, and an SEP was recorded at the level of the T13-L1 interarcuate ligament. Subsequently, stimuli at fractions (1/4x, 1/2x) and multiples (2x, 4x) of RS were delivered. Recordings, using 10x RS stimuli, also were obtained in 2 dogs; in 1 of them, the recordings were obtained before and after curarization. In each instance, the latencies and the amplitudes of the first 3 reproducible deflections were measured and evaluated. RESULTS: The SEP waveform recorded at the T13-L1 level using RS was similar in all dogs; at least 3 deflections were recognized. Altering stimulus intensity did not significantly change latency of the first 3 peaks; conversely, amplitudes of the first 3 peaks increased (P < 0.01) when the stimulus intensity was increased from 1/4x RS to 1x RS. Stimulation at 10x RS induced the recording of a large potential, which was suppressed by the curarization. CONCLUSION: Only slight variations affect latency data through a wide range of stimulus intensities; latency measurement can be considered a robust tool in the vicinity of RS. Slight variations in the electrode position during an SEP session should not invalidate the results. Differences in the definition of the stimulus intensity among laboratories should not preclude the comparison of the results.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]