These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Fewer infections, but maintained antitumor activity with lower-dose versus standard-dose cladribine in pretreated low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Author: Betticher DC, von Rohr A, Ratschiller D, Schmitz SF, Egger T, Sonderegger T, Herrmann R, Kroner T, Zulian GB, Cavalli F, Fey MF, Cerny T.
    Journal: J Clin Oncol; 1998 Mar; 16(3):850-8. PubMed ID: 9508165.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To study the efficacy and the safety of cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine [2-CDA]) administered at two different dosages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this two-cohort study, patients with low-grade refractory/relapsing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) received 2-CDA at a dose of 0.7 mg/kg per cycle as a continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion (group 1, n = 44) or at a reduced dose of 0.5 mg/kg per cycle as a subcutaneous (s.c.) bolus injection (group 2, n = 60). Three 2-CDA cycles at > or = 4-week intervals were planned, then treatment could be pursued until six cycles. RESULTS: A total of 300 cycles were administered (group 1, 114 cycles; group 2, 186). Patient characteristics in both groups were comparable. The median dose-intensities were 0.17 mg/kg/wk and 0.13 mg/kg/wk for groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < or = .0001). The overall response rate for all 104 patients was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45% to 66%; 15% complete response [CR] and 39% partial response [PR]). Response was similar in both patient groups (57% in group 1 and 53% in group 2; P = .72), and no association between 2-CDA dose-intensity and response rate was found (P = .35). Median remission duration was 7 and 12 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .21). Toxicity, in particular opportunistic infections (> or = grade 2, 30% in group 1 v 7% in group 2; P = .003) and myelosuppression (> or = grade 3 neutropenia, 33% v 8% of 2-CDA cycles, P < .0001), were more frequent in group 1. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the infection risk (grade > or = 2) was decreased by 81% with 2-CDA dose reduction in group 2 after adjusting for number of pretreatment regimens and time since diagnosis (P = .01). CONCLUSION: When administered as a s.c. bolus injection, 2-CDA at 0.5 mg/kg per cycle is safe and this dose level should not be exceeded in this patient population.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]