These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored.
    Author: Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL.
    Journal: Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):237-41. PubMed ID: 9522698.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To investigate the cusp fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, adhesively restored with various materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MOD preparations and endodontic treatment was carried out on extracted sound maxillary premolars. The cavities were restored with the amalgam Valiant in combination with Superbond or Panavia bonding, the resin composites Z100, Herculite XRV or Clearfil RP with their respective bonding systems, Z100 in combination with the glass ionomers Ketac Fil, Fuji II and Vitremer, and Tetric in combination with Compoglass. Fracture resistance was measured by axial loading in an Instron testing machine. RESULTS: One of the restorative methods, resin composites in combination with dentin bonding systems in beveled MOD preparations rendered the tooth a cusp fracture resistance which did not differ significantly from that of sound natural teeth. Two other restorative methods, bonded amalgam and a sandwich of glass ionomer cement/resin composite in beveled preparations were significantly weaker in resisting cusp fracture than sound natural teeth, but still significantly stronger than the unrestored tooth with a MOD preparation. It was statistically apparent that several adhesive restorative systems could satisfactorily be used to restore teeth after endodontic therapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]