These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The formation and repair of cisplatin-DNA adducts in wild-type and cisplatin-resistant L1210 cells: comparison of immunocytochemical determination with detection in isolated DNA.
    Author: Blommaert FA, Floot BG, van Dijk-Knijnenburg HC, Berends F, Baan RA, Schornagel JH, den Engelse L, Fichtinger-Schepman AM.
    Journal: Chem Biol Interact; 1998 Jan 30; 108(3):209-25. PubMed ID: 9528691.
    Abstract:
    We have studied the formation and repair of cisplatin-DNA adducts in wild-type mouse leukemia L1210/0 cells and in the sublines L1210/2 and L1210/5, which differ in cisplatin sensitivity. In a colony-formation assay these sublines were 9- and 22-fold more resistant compared to L1210/0, respectively. Cisplatin-induced DNA modification was studied at the cellular level by immunocytochemistry with antiserum NKI-A59 raised against cisplatin-treated DNA. Levels of nuclear staining immediately after a 1-h treatment were similar to those seen after a 24-h post-incubation in drug-free medium. Clear differences in DNA platination were found between the cell lines: immediately after exposure, L1210/2 and L1210/5 showed only 32 and 14%, respectively, of the nuclear staining observed in L1210/0, and 48 and 13% after 24 h. In these experiments, adduct-specific nuclear staining was quantified as the area under the adduct versus concentration curves (AUC). The formation and repair in these cell lines of the bifunctional adducts cis-Pt(NH3)2d(pGpG) (Pt-GG), cis-Pt(NH3)2d(pApG) (Pt-AG) and cis-Pt(NH3)2(dGMP)2 (G-Pt-G) were studied with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). No relation between repair and resistance was observed. The results suggest that differences in induced DNA platination levels, rather than in repair, are responsible--at least in part--for the differences in cisplatin resistance. A mechanism such as an increased tolerance of the resistant cells to plantinum-DNA damage may also be involved.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]