These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Antiseptic efficacy and acceptance of Octenisept computed with common antiseptic mouthwashes]. Author: Kramer A, Höppe H, Krull B, Pitten FA, Rosenau S. Journal: Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1998 Feb; 200(5-6):443-56. PubMed ID: 9531718. Abstract: The efficacy of common antiseptic mouth rinses was evaluated in a study with healthy volunteers. Octenisept and Cetylpyridiniumchlorid had a significant stronger impact on the microbial burden of the oral cavity than Chlorhexidin (Corsodyl) immediately and 10 min after the application. Dobendan (contains Cetylpyridiniumchlorid) showed a better antimicrobial effect than Corsodyl immediately after application, after 10 min an increasing loss of efficacy was noted. The antiseptic efficacy of hexetidin-based Gurfix was very similar to the efficacy observed with Corsodyl from the start of the antiseptic treatment until 1 h later. Acriflavine-solution (0.2% m/v) was significantly less efficient after 10, 30 and 60 min compared to Corsodyl. The antimicrobial impact of Fluomint-Lysoform was very similar to the effect of rinsing with dest. sterile water. A subjective assessment of taste and smell of the mouth rinse solutions concludes the evaluation. Further methodological aspects for a common test guideline for antiseptic mouth rinse solutions are discussed.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]