These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Characterization of actions of Leucophaea tachykinin-related peptides (LemTRPs) and proctolin on cockroach hindgut contractions.
    Author: Winther AM, Muren JE, Lundquist CT, Osborne RH, Nässel DR.
    Journal: Peptides; 1998; 19(3):445-58. PubMed ID: 9533632.
    Abstract:
    The nine Leucophaea Tachykinin-Related Peptides (LemTRP 1-9) isolated from the midgut and brain of the cockroach, Leucophaea maderae, all induced increases in spontaneous contractions of the L. maderae hindgut. Synthetic LemTRP 1 and 3-9, were equally potent in inducing contractions of the hindgut. More than seven of the nine C-terminal residues of the closely related locust peptide locustatachykinin I (LomTK I) are required for full activity of the peptide on the L. maderae hindgut. Proctolin, a well characterized myostimulatory neuropeptide, was shown to be more potent than LemTRPs. LemTRP 1 and proctolin did not have synergistic actions in potentiating the amplitude and tonus of contractions of the L. maderae hindgut. Several differences could be seen in actions of LemTRP 1 and proctolin. In contrast to proctolin, LemTRP 1 could not override the inhibitory action of 10(-9) M of the myoinhibitory peptide leucomyosuppressin. Spantide I, an antagonist of the mammalian tachykinin receptors, at a concentration of 5 microM, blocked the response to LemTRP 1, but not to proctolin. The competitive proctolin receptor antagonist [alpha-methyl-L-tyrosine2]-proctolin blocked the action of both proctolin and LemTRP 1 when applied at 1 microM, whereas cycloproctolin had no antagonist action on either peptide. Verapamil, a blocker of voltage gated Ca2+-channels, and the less specific Ca2+-channel blocker Mn2+, abolished the action of LemTRP 1, but not of proctolin. The results obtained indicate that LemTRPs act on receptors distinct from those of proctolin. Double label immunocytochemistry revealed that all LomTK-like immunoreactive fibers impinge on the proctolinergic fibers in the hindgut. This finding and the inhibitory actions of Ca2+-channel blockers on TRP responses and of the proctolin receptor antagonist on both peptides, may suggest that the LemTRP receptors are not on the hindgut muscle fibers but on the terminals of the proctolinergic neurons. Thus, LemTRPs may induce release of proctolin on the hindgut. An alternative is that LemTRPs act by mechanisms clearly distinct from those of proctolin.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]