These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Poor compliance with universal precautions among Danish physicians].
    Author: Lunding S, Nielsen TL, Nielsen JO.
    Journal: Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Mar 16; 160(12):1789-93. PubMed ID: 9536634.
    Abstract:
    In a nation-wide survey among Danish doctors, the compliance and reasons for non-compliance with universal precautions (UP) and the associated circumstances of mucocutaneous blood exposure (MCE) were studied. Of 9384 questionnaires, 6256 (67%) were returned and 6005 were eligible for analysis. Only 35% complied with the basic principles of UP. Compliance with protective barrier use in surgical versus non-surgical specialties was: Gloves 63.0% and 23.4%, masks 55.2% and 17.6% and protective eyewear 11.5% and 4.0% respectively. Common given reasons for non-compliance were: "Interferes with working skills", "forget", "wear spectacles", "not available", "too much trouble to get" or "gloves do not fit". Of 741 MCE described in detail, an estimated 84-98% were potentially preventable if appropriate barriers had been worn. More than half of MCE were preventable by two interventions only: Compulsory use of protective eyewear during operations and of gloves during insertion of peripheral i.v.-catheters. In conclusion compliance with UP is unacceptably low and the majority of MCE were potentially preventable if appropriate barriers had been worn.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]