These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Quantification of left-to-right shunt in atrial septal defect using oximetry, isotopes, and Doppler echocardiography. Is there a method of reference?].
    Author: Evangelista A, Aguadé S, Candell-Riera J, Angel J, Galve E, García del Castillo H, González-Alujas T, Soler-Soler J.
    Journal: Rev Esp Cardiol; 1998; 51 Suppl 1():2-9. PubMed ID: 9549394.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Determination of pulmonary to systemic blood flow ratio (QP/QS) is considered to be important for the management of patients with atrial septal defect. The QP/QS provides information on shunt severity and is usually determined by three methods: oximetry, first-pass radionuclide angiocardiography and Doppler echocardiography. The aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy and concordance level of these three methods in QP/QS quantification in atrial septal defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four adult atrial septal defects patients in whom QP/QS was determined by these three methods with a 6 month interval were studied. Nuclear and echocardiographic post-surgical studies were repeated in 36 patients. RESULTS: QP/QS values determined by the three techniques had a low correlation between them: oximetry (r = 0.52; SEE = 0.74); radionuclide angiocardiography (r = 0.40; SEE = 0.79) and Doppler echocardiography (r = 0.72; SEE = 0.57). Radionuclide angiocardiography underestimated QP/QS > 3 (-0.61 +/- 1.21; p < 0.01). Only in 33% of studies there concordance (differences < 0.5) among the three methods and in 58% between two methods. Right ventricular dilatation and tricuspid regurgitation influenced radionuclide accuracy. Nevertheless, the correlation between this technique and echocardiography was satisfactory when the 36 post-surgical were included (r = 0.75); both techniques agreed in the diagnosis of the two cases with residual post-surgical shunt. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-method disparity in QP/QS quantification is high and no method can be used as a gold standard; clinical decisions therefore based on QP/QS quantification by one technique alone are ill-advised.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]