These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Comparative evaluation of three recombinant antigen-based enzyme immunoassays for detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to human parvovirus B19. Author: Pickering JW, Forghani B, Shell GR, Wu L. Journal: Clin Diagn Virol; 1998 Jan; 9(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 9562859. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of acute and past infection with parvovirus B19 is based on detection of IgM and IgG antibodies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate two commercial recombinant antigen-based enzyme immunoassay (EIA) test kits for detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to parvovirus B19 and to compare the commercial EIAs to in-house EIA test procedures. STUDY DESIGN: A panel of 121 sera was used to compare the three IgM EIAs. The panel included 84 sera submitted for parvovirus B19 testing and 37 sera that were IgM positive for other viral pathogens. The same serum panel plus an additional 14 sera submitted for B19 testing was used to compare the three IgG EIAs. The commercial EIAs were performed according to manufacturers' instructions. Using the in-house EIA test procedures as the reference, sensitivity and specificity for each of the commercial EIAs was determined. RESULTS: The commercial B19 IgM EIAs showed agreements of 95.0 and 93.4% to the in-house IgM EIA. Compared to the in-house B19 IgM EIA, the commercial B19 IgM EIAs were 97.4 and 97.5% sensitive, respectively. Specificities were 93.5 and 91.4%, respectively. Sensitivities for the commercial IgG EIAs, compared to in-house IgG EIA, were 88.0 and 85.2%, respectively, and specificities were 94.1 and 98.0%. CONCLUSION: We found that the commercial parvovirus B19 IgM and IgG EIAs are comparable to standard in-house EIAs and are suitable for testing for B19 antibodies in human sera.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]