These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Anti-F(ab')2 antibody in HIV type 1 infection: relationship to hypergammaglobulinemia and to antibody specific to the V3 loop region of glycoprotein 120.
    Author: Morrison SA, Pearson SL, Steigbigel RT.
    Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses; 1998 Apr 10; 14(6):491-8. PubMed ID: 9566551.
    Abstract:
    As HIV infection and autoimmune disease share certain similarities, it has been suggested that HIV may disrupt control of humoral immunity by the antiidiotype network, and that this may be evident as increased IgG antibody to F(ab')2. When anti-F(ab')2 was quantified by ELISA in sera of randomly chosen HIV-infected versus uninfected donors, some HIV-infected sera did contain increased anti-F(ab')2, resulting in a median amount twofold higher than in uninfected sera. Moreover, when data were grouped by blood CD4 lymphocyte count, anti-F(ab')2 in HIV+ groups appeared to rise as CD4 lymphocytes declined. However, increased anti-F(ab')2 mirrored the elevation in serum IgG closely, and normalization of anti-F(ab')2 to serum IgG concentration equalized the groups so that no relationship to CD4 lymphocytes remained. Hypergammaglobulinemia is therefore strongly implicated as a cause of variation in anti-F(ab')2. After dissociation of immune complexes, anti-F(ab')2 activity per microgram of monomeric IgG was slightly increased over normal only in the HIV-infected group with fewest CD4 lymphocytes, without statistical significance. In contrast, the proportion of IgG antibody to the V3-neutralizing determinant in HIV-1 decreased significantly as disease advanced. The same was true for 12 HIV+ individuals studied longitudinally for 500-1300 days. The data suggest that measuring serum anti-F(ab')2 is misleading when immune complexes are present: apparent increases as disease progresses are due to increased IgG and, possibly, to related technical artifacts. During HIV infection, the proportion of antiidiotypic IgG in fact remains unaltered or falls, making this an unlikely cause of suppressed humoral immunity to HIV-1.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]