These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Can deliveries at risk be selected at smaller delivery units?].
    Author: Holt J, Vold IN.
    Journal: Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1998 Mar 20; 118(8):1218-20. PubMed ID: 9567699.
    Abstract:
    In order to explore the possibility of converting a delivery unit at a small hospital to a maternity home, we examined the medical records of those women who delivered by Caesarean section, forceps or vacuum extraction at Lofoten hospital during 1995. How many of these women might it have been necessary to transfer to an obstetrical department if Lofoten hospital had been a maternity home caring for low risk deliveries (primipara and multipara)? Out of a total of 271 deliveries (primiparas 98), 49 women delivered by Caesarean section (n = 35), forceps (n = 5) or vacuum extraction (n = 9). Using risk assessment, 22 women (45%) would have been selected for antenatal transfer, and 20 (41%) for intrapartum transport. For seven women no transfer would have been possible. These women would have delivered locally by vacuum extraction. Primipara versus multipara had a relative risk of 2.8 for Caesarean section or assisted vaginal delivery. It is estimated that 8-9% of the women would be selected prenatally for planned delivery at a hospital unit and that 7-8% would be transferred in labour if primiparas delivered at the maternity home. If primiparas were excluded, the proportions would be 41% and 1-2% respectively. In 1997 the delivery unit at Lofoten hospital was temporarily converted to a maternity home for a period of two years.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]