These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Sensitivity of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests in relation to western blot in detecting human T-cell lymphotropic virus types I and II infection among HIV-1 infected patients from São Paulo, Brazil.
    Author: Caterino-de-Araujo A, de los Santos-Fortuna E, Meleiro MC, Suleiman J, Calabrò ML, Favero A, De Rossi A, Chieco-Bianchi L.
    Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Mar; 30(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 9572023.
    Abstract:
    We investigated the presence of human T-cell lymphotropic virus types I and II (HTLV-I and HTLV-II) infections, first searching for specific antibodies in 553 serum samples obtained from HIV-1-infected patients from São Paulo, Brazil. Sera were screened using two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs): the ELISA-EM (ELISA HTLV-I/II, EMBRABIO, BR), which contains HTLV-I and HTLV-II lysates, and the ELISA-DB [ELISA HTLV-I/II, Diagnostic Biotechnology (DB), Singapore], which contains HTLV-I lysate, and HTLV-I and HTLV-II recombinant env proteins (MTA-1 and K55, respectively). Serum samples showing two positive and/or borderline results were confirmed by Western blot (WB 2.3, DB), which discriminates HTLV-I from HTLV-II. WB analyses disclosed 22 cases (4.0%) of HTLV-I and 34 (6.1%) of HTLV-II seroreactivity; 24 sera had indeterminate antibody profile (4.3%) and 2 specimens showed reactivity to both MTA-1 and K55 env proteins. Using stringent WB criteria and analyzing the population according to risk factors, the prevalence rates of HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections were 11.2% and 16.8% in i.v. drug users, 3.4% and 5.5% in heterosexual individuals, and 1.4% and 2.2% in homosexual/bisexual men, respectively. A comparison of ELISA and WB results disclosed that both ELISAs were highly sensitive in detecting HTLV-I antibodies, whereas the ELISA-DB showed 82% sensitivity and the ELISA-EM 100% sensitivity in detecting HTLV-II antibodies. PCR analyses conducted on 37 representative cells samples confirmed the presence of HTLV proviral DNA in the majority of concordant serological cases, except in one, which was HTLV-I infected and seroreacted with K55 protein of HTLV-II. Indeed, after PCR, one case of HTLV-I infection and HTLV-II coinfection, and 30% of WB-seroindeterminate or inconclusive cases infected with HTLV-II could be detected. Our data stress high prevalences of both HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections in HIV-1 coinfected i.v. drug users from São Paulo, and suggests that ELISA kits containing only K55 protein as the HTLV-II-specific antigen, may not have the appropriate sensitivity for the detection of HTLV-II infection in this geographic region, pointing out the need of improved screening tests to be used in Brazil.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]