These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Propofol-based versus fentanyl-isoflurane-based anesthesia for cardiac surgery.
    Author: Engoren MC, Kraras C, Garzia F.
    Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1998 Apr; 12(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 9583550.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate drug costs, time of mechanical ventilation, complications, and hospital length of stay comparing propofol-based with fentanyl-isoflurane-based anesthesia. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study. SETTING: A university-affiliated, tertiary care community hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to either a low-dose fentanyl-isoflurane or a lower-dose fentanyl-isoflurane anesthetic supplemented with a continuous infusion of propofol. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fentanyl-isoflurane anesthesia was significantly less expensive ($50.03+/-$27.26 v $121.69+/-$31.40) for anesthesia drugs and ($58.08+/-$27.39 v $129.91+/-$31.52) for total drug costs. There was also a trend for patients in the fentanyl-isoflurane group to be extubated slightly sooner (388+/-202 v 449+/-252 min) and go home sooner (5.1+/-1.8 v 6.0+/-3.0 days). CONCLUSION: Fentanyl-isoflurane provides an inexpensive anesthetic that permits as prompt an extubation as propofol, thus conserving resources for other patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]