These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Intermediate follow up of the TEKNA bileaflet valve.
    Author: Seybold-Epting W, Limet R, Scheld H, Frank G, Hannekum A, David M, Tatou E, Wolner E, Loisance D, Kassal H, Ryba EA.
    Journal: J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 9587865.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The study aim was to collect intermediate clinical data on the TEKNA bileaflet valve. METHODS: This nine-center clinical study involved 884 patients implanted between June 1990 and October 1993. The population consisted of 522 (59.0%) males and 362 (41.0%) females. Mean age at implant was 59.1 +/- 11.8 years (range: 14.7 to 88.4 years). Indication for valve replacement was dependent on the position: stenosis was the predominant reason in the aortic position; regurgitation was more pronounced for the mitral position. A total of 261 (29.5%) patients underwent concomitant procedures. Mean follow up is 2.7 +/- 1.2 years; total follow up is 2386.1 patient-years (pt-yr). RESULTS: Total operative (< or = 30 days postoperative) mortality rate was 3.7%; seven patients (0.8%) died due to valve-related causes. Total postoperative (> 30 days postoperative) mortality rate was 2.5%/pt-yr and included a valve-related mortality rate of 1.1%/pt-yr. The following valve-related complication rates (%/pt-yr) were reported for the long-term postoperative period: thromboembolism 0.6; valve thrombosis 0.3; bleeding events 1.5; non-structural deterioration 0.6; and endocarditis 0.4. No structural valve deterioration was reported. Actuarial freedom at four years was: overall survival rate 86.9 +/- 1.4%; valve-related survival rate 94.7 +/- 1.0%; freedom from thromboembolism 96.8 +/- 0.9%; valve thrombosis 99.3 +/- 0.3%; endocarditis 98.5 +/- 0.5%; bleeding events 94.3 +/- 1.0%; and non-structural deterioration 98.2 +/- 0.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that observed mortality is due mainly to non-valve-related disorders. Risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events was low (0.9%/pt-yr and 1.5%/pt-yr, respectively). We conclude that this valve is safe and efficacious for use.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]