These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Renal effects of amphotericin B lipid complex.
    Author: Luke RG, Boyle JA.
    Journal: Am J Kidney Dis; 1998 May; 31(5):780-5. PubMed ID: 9590187.
    Abstract:
    A study was conducted to compare the renal effects of amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), a lipid formulation of the widely used antifungal medication, with conventional amphotericin B (AmB) in the treatment of serious fungal infections, including invasive candidiasis, cryptococcal meningitis, and aspergillosis. The clinical experience of ABLC includes two types of open-label studies: randomized comparative (ABLC 5 mg/kg/d compared with AmB 0.6 to 1 mg/kg) and emergency use. In the comparative studies, changes in serum creatinine were evaluated three ways: doubling of the baseline value, an increase from < or = 1.5 mg/dL at baseline to > or = 1.5 mg/dL, and an increase from < or = 1.5 mg/dL at baseline to > or = 2.0 mg/dL. More patients in the AmB group reached these end points than in the ABLC group (P < or = 0.007), and the time needed to reach each of these end points was significantly shorter for the AmB group (P < or = 0.02). Increased serum creatinine was reported as an adverse event more frequently by patients receiving AmB than by patients receiving ABLC. In the emergency use study, a steady and statistically significant decrease in serum creatinine was observed among patients who started ABLC treatment with serum creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dL due to prior AmB treatment. ABLC offers the physician a valuable, less-nephrotoxic alternative to AmB for the treatment of patients with severe, invasive fungal infections.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]