These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of fluoride release from various dental materials.
    Author: Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ, Van Wyk Kotze TJ.
    Journal: J Dent; 1998 Mar; 26(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 9594479.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine, in vitro, the relative short- and long-term fluoride release from four resin-modified glass ionomers (Fuji II LC, Vitremer, Enforce & Advance), a polyacid-modified composite resin (Dyract compomer) and a bonding agent (OptiBond). METHODS: All the materials were prepared as outlined by the manufacturers. Circular discs of the materials mentioned were suspended in water for up to 300 days and the non-cumulative 24-h fluoride release was determined potentiometrically at chosen times. RESULTS: The amounts of fluoride released during the first day were Vitremer (1.46 micrograms mm-2), Advance (1.18 micrograms mm-2), Fuji (1.08 micrograms mm-2), Optibond (0.33 microgram mm-2), Dyract (0.31 microgram mm-2) and Enforce (0.15 microgram mm-2). After the second day the sequence changed slightly and remained approximately the same for the rest of the 300-day period. There was also an increase in the fluoride release during the 60-200-day period relative to the previous period. CONCLUSION: In general the most fluoride was released by Advance and not by Fuji II LC or Vitremer. For most materials, fluoride is still released after 300 days. Furthermore, even a thin layer of bonding agent released a relatively high amount of fluoride (volume-wise the most) at the beginning. It is deduced that even the release of relatively low amounts of fluoride may result in significant concentrations of fluoride in a microleakage gap.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]