These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Coronary vasoreactivity to ergonovine after angioplasty: difference between the infarct-related coronary artery and the noninfarct-related coronary artery. Author: Yoshitomi Y, Kojima S, Sugi T, Matsumoto Y, Yano M, Kuramochi M. Journal: Coron Artery Dis; 1998; 9(2-3):105-11. PubMed ID: 9647411. Abstract: BACKGROUND: The vasoreactivity after direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with previous myocardial infarction remains unknown. We examined the constrictor response to ergonovine of the infarct-related coronary artery in comparison with that of noninfarct-related coronary artery after angioplasty. METHODS: Ergonovine was administered intravenously to 17 patients with previous myocardial infarction (group I) and to 21 patients with stable angina (group II) 1 year after PTCA. The effects of ergonovine on lumen diameter were analysed quantitatively at the PTCA segment, nonPTCA segment (proximal to the PTCA segment), and nonPTCA artery. RESULTS: The ergonovine-induced decrease in minimal lumen diameter at the PTCA segment was significant in group I (decrease from 2.12 +/- 0.56 to 1.39 +/- 0.74 mm, P < 0.01), but not in group II (decrease from 1.60 +/- 0.35 to 1.43 +/- 0.33 mm, NS). Patients in group I showed a constrictor response at the nonPTCA artery (decrease in diameter from 2.54 +/- 0.90 to 1.94 +/- 0.77 mm, P < 0.01), and a tendency to constrict at the nonPTCA segment (2.56 +/- 0.67 to 2.11 +/- 0.66 mm, P = 0.06), whereas those in group II showed no significant constrictor response to ergonovine at any of the three segments examined. The changes in diameter at the three segments in patients in group I were significantly greater than those in group II (all P < 0.01). Subtotal coronary spasm at the PTCA segment was provoked only in three patients in group I (18%). CONCLUSIONS: The constrictor response to ergonovine of the infarct-related coronary artery was enhanced compared with that of the noninfarct-related coronary artery. This difference in coronary vasoreactivity at the angioplasty segment may be due to previous hypersensitivity of the smooth muscle.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]