These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Urinary stress incontinence. Comparison of the Raz technique and the Bologna technique. Analysis of a series of 188 patients]. Author: Giacalone PL, Laffargue F, Daurés JP, Lombard I, Lombard G. Journal: J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Apr; 27(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 9648009. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate and compare the perioperative morbidity and the long-term results of the Raz colposuspension and the Bologna operation for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. STUDY DESIGN: Data of 188 women who underwent either a Bologna operation (group 1) or a Raz colposuspension (group 2) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence between January 1, 1987 and December 1, 1995 were analysed retrospectively regarding history, preoperative evaluation, associated surgical procedures, complications and cure and failure rate. POPULATION AND METHODS: 80 patients were treated with the Bologna operation and 108 with the Raz colposuspension. Patients with prior anti-incontinence surgery, and patients with a preoperative diagnosis of urge incontinence were excluded from the study. Success was defined both subjectively (complete absence of complaint of stress urinary incontinence) and objectively (no evidence of loss of urine on cough provocation during physical examination). Survival curves were generated in each group for time to event data: "time to recurrent stress incontinence" and compared by the logrank test. A multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to indentify possible outcome predictors. RESULTS: The success rate of group 1 was significantly higher than that of group 2 (p = 0.00001). The median of success was 51 months in group 1 and 21 months in group 2 (p = 0.00001). The incidence of intraoperative complications in each group (inadvertent cystostomy, hemorrhage) did not differ. The multivariate analyses using the Cox regression model showed that the most highly correlated variable with the surgical cure rate was the type of surgical anti-incontinence procedure adopted: Bologna or Raz (p = 0.00001) CONCLUSION: In our hands, the Bologna operation has a higher cure rate than the Raz colposuspension. For us, when treating patients with stress urinary incontinence by the vaginal route, the Bologna operation is indicated when sufficient anterior vaginal tissue is available to create vaginal bands.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]