These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparison of chemotherapy CHOP vs. CHOP/VIA in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized multicenter study of 132 patients. The PETHEMA group. Program for Study and Therapeutics of malignant hemopathies. Spanish Association of Hematology and Hemotherapy].
    Author: López-Guillermo A, García-Conde J, Alvarez-Carmona AM, León P, Maldonado J, Alcalá A, Zubizarreta A, Sancho-Tello R, Carbonell F, Contreras E, Besses C, Hernando A, Fontanillas M, Montserrat E.
    Journal: Med Clin (Barc); 1998 May 09; 110(16):601-4. PubMed ID: 9656196.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: To compare standard chemotherapy CHOP (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone) with the regimen CHOP/VIA (VP-16, iphosphamide and cytarabine) in terms of response to therapy, response duration, survival and toxicity in patients with aggressive lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 132 patients (84 males and 48 females; median age, 55 years) were included from 12 Spanish Institutions, diagnosed of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of intermediate or high grade, in stages II-IV and previously untreated. Patients were randomized to receive CHOP or CHOP/VIA. RESULTS: After excluding 14 not assessable cases, 62 patients (52.5%) received CHOP, and 56 (47.5%) CHOP/VIA. No significant differences were found on main prognostic factors between such groups. Response was assessable in 114 cases (CHOP: 61; CHOP/VIA: 53) 39 patients (64%) receiving CHOP achieved complete response (CR), and 2 (3%) partial response (PR), whereas in the CHOP/VIA group CR and PR rates were 63% (34/53), and 7% (4/53), respectively. 14 patients (36%) treated with CHOP and 12 (35%) treated with CHOP/VIA eventually relapsed, with an actuarial risk of relapse at 36 months of 43% and 40%, respectively. Median survival was 37 months. No differences were found between both therapeutic groups, with an overall survival at 36 months from diagnosis of 53.5% (CI 95%: 40-67) for CHOP and 48% (CI 95%: 34-62) for CHOP/VIA. Finally, toxicity was not different for both arms. CONCLUSION: In the present study in patients with aggressive NHL chemotherapy regimens CHOP and CHOP/VIA showed similar results in terms of response, response duration, survival and toxicity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]