These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Dissociation of hemispheric exploitation of rods and cones for simple detection.
    Author: Braun CM, Achim A, Charron JF, Côté A.
    Journal: Am J Psychol; 1998; 111(2):241-63. PubMed ID: 9664649.
    Abstract:
    Sergent (1982a, 1982b, 1982c) proposed that stimuli carrying high luminous energy will be better detected in the right field (left hemisphere) and stimuli carrying low energy in the left visual field (right hemisphere). A photoreceptor-based model could explain the same effects as well as several others (eccentricity effects, retinal adaptation effects). Braun, Mailloux, and Dufresne (1995) suggested that cones might favor right field stimuli and rods might favor left field stimuli. We implemented a series of near-threshold simple detection experiments comprising stimuli varying along four dimensions (color, eccentricity, duration, and size) in dark-adapted subjects. Consistent and significant right field advantages accrued for near-meridianal foveal red stimuli, but there were no field effects for eccentric blue stimuli. An alternative to Sergent's stimulus energy model and the photoreceptor-based model, namely a parvocellular-magnocellular model, is proposed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]