These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Addressing preconception risks identified at the time of a negative pregnancy test. A randomized trial.
    Author: Jack BW, Culpepper L, Babcock J, Kogan MD, Weismiller D.
    Journal: J Fam Pract; 1998 Jul; 47(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9673606.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: A preconception care program has the potential to assist women who want to become pregnant by advising these women about risk factors, healthy lifestyles, and assessing readiness for pregnancy. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine whether comprehensive preconception risk assessment at the time of a negative pregnancy test followed by referral to primary care services is effective in initiating treatment for women with preconception risk factors. METHODS: One hundred seventy women were offered preconception risk assessment following a negative pregnancy test. Women were assigned randomly either to a usual care group or an intervention group. Women in the latter group were informed about the risks identified and received an appointment with a primary care clinician who was also informed. Women in the usual care group and their clinicians received no feedback. All charts were reviewed and the women were contacted by telephone to determine if interventions to reduce risk were offered by clinicians during the year following the assessment. RESULTS: An average of 8.96 risks were identified per woman. The proportion of women having risks in each of 12 risk categories studied ranged from 19% to 71%. One hundred women (59%) made at least one visit during the subsequent year, thus allowing the opportunity for preconception care. The proportion of these women who had a risk addressed ranged from 18% for psychosocial risks to 48% for those with fetal exposures (smoking, alcohol, and drug use). There was no difference between groups in the percentage of risks addressed. CONCLUSIONS: The notification of women and their clinicians of identified preconception risks did not improve intervention rates. A more organized intervention system including office-based protocols is needed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]