These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Fertility awareness and natural family planning.
    Author: Pyper CM.
    Journal: Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1997 Jun; 2(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 9678103.
    Abstract:
    Information about fertility awareness helps to fulfil the broader definition of the services many family planning clinics offer. Although information about natural family planning is requested by a small number of clients seeking family planning advice, many more clients benefit from information about fertility awareness. Fertility awareness is far more than just basic reproductive anatomy and physiology; fertility awareness involves understanding basic information about fertility and reproduction, being able to apply it to oneself, and being able to discuss it with a partner or with a health professional. Fertility awareness is fundamental to understanding and making informed decisions about reproductive health and sexual health. If clients have a better understanding of fertility awareness, they are in a stronger position to make informed decisions about how they wish to manage their reproductive and sexual health, for example: (1) Fertility awareness information is used to help couples to plan pregnancies as well as to avoid them. This can be helpful to couples who are having difficulty conceiving, for the timing of intercourse or for the timing of some of the sub-fertility investigations. (2) The information is also useful when helping couples to understand how each method of family planning works--how the family planning method interrupts normal fertility, how the method will fail if not used correctly, and how fertility returns when the method is discontinued. (3) Women who are fully breastfeeding value the knowledge about reduced fertility, as do women during the perimenopausal years who value being given clear information about their declining fertility. (4) When counselling couples about the importance of avoiding sexually transmitted diseases it is important they understand sexually transmitted diseases may damage their fertility. (5) Couples who choose only to use a barrier method during the time they think the woman is fertile are a group who do not readily identify themselves to family planning providers. These couples often do not have adequate information about fertility awareness. Advances in technology and the understanding of ovulation, ovum and sperm survival have confirmed that the guidelines used to teach fertility awareness and natural family planning effectively identify the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Serial ultrasound studies on the ovaries during the menstrual cycle have confirmed the accuracy of the hormonal assays in pinpointing the likely time of ovulation. Ultrasound studies have also shown that subjective observations of the alterations in cervical mucus and the basal body temperature rise are accurate indicators of the fertile phase. Research on the chances of conception on each day of the menstrual cycle, using hormonal assays to estimate the time of ovulation, was carried out in 1994 by Weinberg and Wilcox. Their results showed that the timing of sexual intercourse, in relation to ovulation, strongly influences the chance of conception. Conception only occurred during a 6-day interval that ended on the estimated day of ovulation. The chances of conception fell to zero 24 hours after ovulation. Several different methods of natural family planning are taught; some methods depend on only using one of the indicators of fertility, others are based on two or more indicators. The main indicators of fertility are: observing the cervical mucus, recording the basal body temperature, palpating the cervix and a calculation based on the cycle length. Research studies performed using a combination of the indicators of fertility show that the failure rate using a combination is less than most of the studies which use a single indicator. In each case the method failure is far lower than the user failure. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]