These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Effects of regional stimulation using a miniature stimulator implanted in feline posterior biceps femoris. Author: Cameron T, Richmond FJ, Loeb GE. Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Aug; 45(8):1036-43. PubMed ID: 9691578. Abstract: The effects of placement of a miniature implantable stimulator on motor unit recruitment were examined in the posterior head of cat biceps femoris. The implantable stimulator (13-mm long x 2-mm diameter) was injected either proximally near the main nerve branch, or distally near the muscle insertion, through a 12-gauge hypodermic needle. Glycogen-depletion methods were used to map the distribution of fibers activated by electrical stimulation. Muscle fibers were found to be depleted at most or all proximodistal levels of the muscle, but the density of depleted fibers varied transversely according to the stimulus strength and proximity of the device to the nerve-entry site. Thus, muscle cross sections often had a "patchy" appearance produced because different proportions of depleted fibers intermingled with undepleted fibers in different parts of the cross section. In other preparations, the force of muscle contraction was measured when stimuli of varying strengths were delivered by the stimulator positioned at the same proximal or distal sites within the muscle. Devices placed close to the nerve-entry site produced the greatest forces. Those placed more distally produced less force. As stimulus current and/or pulse width increased, muscle force increased, often in steps, until a maximum was reached, which was usually limited by the compliance voltage of the device to less than the force produced by whole nerve stimulation.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]